Do you often struggle because you
don't get enough sleep on a nightly basis? Or perhaps you sleep in as much as
you can each day, since your schedule permits it? Neither of these is good for
you, a new study suggests, and you may be at risk of metabolic problems.
How might sleep duration influence
the risk of metabolic syndrome?
We already know that too little
sleep can impact our health in myriad ways,
but to what extent does too much sleep effect our well-being?
A study recently conducted by
researchers from Seoul National University College of Medicine in South Korea
has discovered that both of these extremes are liable to increase the risk
of metabolic
syndrome.
This refers to a cluster of
metabolic conditions, including low glucose tolerance, hypertension, and obesity.
Lead study author Claire E. Kim and
her team analyzed data sourced through the Health
Examinees (HEXA) study, a large population study investigating
the interaction of genetic and environmental factors in the context of chronic
disease incidence in South Korea.
Their results —
which have been reported in the journal BMC Public Health —
not only indicate a correlation between extremes of sleep and metabolic
syndrome, but also suggest that the risks may be different depending on a
person's sex.
Sleep
duration and metabolic syndrome
Kim and team analyzed the medical
data of 133,608 men and women aged 40–69. The participants also self-reported
how much sleep they got every day, including both night-time sleep and any
daytime naps.
The HEXA study included information
on the participants' medical histories, use of medication, modifying lifestyle
factors, and family medical history.
All of the volunteers also provided
samples of plasma, serum, blood cells, urine, and chromosomal DNA, among other
things.
Analyses of the participants'
collected data — including the self-reported information on sleep hygiene —
revealed that both fewer than 6 and more than 10 hours of sleep on a daily
basis were linked to the presence of metabolic syndrome.
Individuals were deemed to have
metabolic syndrome if they presented at least three of these tell-tale
symptoms: excess fat around the waist; high triglyceride levels; low levels of
high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or "good," cholesterol; high fasting
blood glucose; and hypertension.
Just over 29 percent of the male
participants had metabolic syndrome, and 24.5 percent of the women showed signs
of this condition. The team noted certain differences in risk patterns.
'Potential
gender difference' observed
So, women who slept little — for
fewer than 6 hours per day — were likelier to have a higher waist
circumference, indicative of excessive belly fat, than women who slept for 6–7
hours per day.
Men who slept for under 6 hours were
more likely to have not just a higher waist circumference, but also metabolic
syndrome.
As for oversleeping — defined as
more than 10 hours of sleep each day — it was tied to raised triglyceride
levels, as well as metabolic syndrome, in men.
But in women, it was linked with
even more negative health outcomes: not just metabolic syndrome and high
triglyceride levels, but also high blood sugar, low HDL cholesterol, and higher waist circumference.
Of the participants, about 13
percent of the women and 11 percent of the men slept too little, and 1.7
percent of the women and 1.5 percent of the men slept for over 10 hours every
day.
"This is the largest study
examining a dose-response association between sleep duration and metabolic
syndrome and its components separately for men and women," Kim explains.
"We observed a potential gender difference between
sleep duration and metabolic syndrome, with an association between metabolic
syndrome and long sleep in women and metabolic syndrome and short sleep in
men."
It is not clear how sleep patterns
might influence the development of metabolic syndrome, but the researchers note
that sleep duration could impact the production of key hormones that regulate
appetite and how much energy our bodies produce and consume.
Kim and colleagues also note that,
although this study's findings may be compelling, the research observed an
association that may not necessarily speak of a cause and effect relationship.
The authors acknowledge some
limitations to their study, including the fact that the information on sleep
duration was self-reported, so there were no objective measurements in this
regard, as well as the fact that the analysis amalgamated night-time sleep and
daytime naps.
No comments:
Post a Comment