H
|
ealth claims that manufacturers make
on food packaging might not match a product's nutritional benefits, but people
still make buying decisions based on these claims, researchers reveal.
Do the claims on cereal boxes sway
us?
The
nutritional facts and ingredients that appear on a product's packaging aim to
reveal what consumers want to know about a food.
A
consumer might choose to look at a product's calorie, fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamin, or mineral
content.
Those
factors, as well as the potential presence of allergens and other ingredients,
all work together to reveal a product's content.
However,
many manufacturers print claims that can steer consumers in one direction or
the other.
People
often make buying decisions based on these perceptions and, interestingly, such
claims do not always correspond with a product's actual nutritional status.
This
fact led to four studies, which the researchers combined into a single paper
and published in the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. They examined
the claims printed on the front of food packaging and assessed the differences
between these claims and the products' nutritional content.
They
also looked into how consumers reacted to these claims when it was time to make
a buying decision. The wanted to determine whether the claims were accurate and
whether they affected purchasing choices, regardless of their accuracy.
The
authors hailed from institutions including INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France, the
Rotterdam School of Management in the Netherlands, and Vanderbilt University in
Nashville, TN.
Food claims and nutritional benefits
Food
claims that appear on packaging usually follow science- or nature-based
arguments, such as "improved" or "preserved."
They
tend to highlight either the positive attributes of the food or the absence of
negative ones.
For
example, they may add positives by claiming that a food is "high in calcium"
or "high-protein," or removing negatives by claiming that it is
"gluten-free" or "low-cholesterol."
Other
ways to promote a product's benefits include not adding negatives, such as "no artificial
flavor" or "GMO-free," or not removing positives, such as
"all natural" or "pure."
Labeling and its effect on consumers
The
researchers tested front-of-package (FOP) claims that appeared on different
breakfast cereals and milk products. One study, for example, tested 633
different breakfast cereals, of which 460 had a health or nutrition claim on
the front of the package.
They
conducted these studies using survey questions paired with attention checks to
determine how each would evaluate different FOP claims. They examined how the
various claims affected consumer behavior.
"We found that consumers had a
more positive attitude toward claims that are based on the presence of
something good, compared to claims that are about the absence of something
bad."
Study
co-author Prof. Pierre Chandon, INSEAD
In
other words, people felt that when positive components were present, these
items were more healthful than those whose claims removed perceived negatives.
Also,
people felt that the type of claim would help predict the product's
healthfulness, taste, or dieting properties, even though none of the claims
explicitly said that they would make them healthier or aid weight loss.
There was also not much of a connection, they found,
between the positive claims and the nutritional content of the breakfast
cereals. In fact, Prof. Chandon notes that the actual correlation was almost
zero.
FOP claims rarely reflect truth
Though
this study examined health claims from a marketing standpoint, it is possible
to make some health-related conclusions from the findings.
The
researchers did find that FOP claims often do not truly reflect a product's
ingredients and how they relate to health or weight loss.
Instead,
it is more accurate to examine the nutrition label to get a better idea of how
a particular food can help someone lose weight, maintain weight loss, or enjoy
a healthier life.
Source. Medical News Today
No comments:
Post a Comment