According to a recent study, larger
portions of food might not be so bad for us after all. The findings add to our
understanding of the psychology of healthful eating.
Portion control is important, and a
new study provides a positive spin.
If somebody gives us a huge bowl of
candy, we are likely to eat more of it than if someone gives us a smaller bowl
of candy.
Scientists have studied the
so-called portion size effect in some depth.
One review of the research found
that when a portion size is doubled, people consume an average of 35 percent more.
Food outlets often advertise larger
portion sizes to attract customers, and many health professionals believe that
this tactic might play a role in the rise of obesity in the United States.
For this reason, health-conscious
people around the world make sure to only give themselves small portions of
foods that some may call unhealthful.
Despite a great deal of research
into the negative consequences of portion size, very few studies have focused
on the potential benefits. Could increasing portion size of healthful snacks
increase their consumption?
With this in mind, researchers from
Deakin University in Australia recently set out to see whether the effect would
work in reverse.
The study, which Prof. Chris
Dubelaar led, was a coordinated effort between scientists in Australia and
France. Their findings now appear in the journal Food Quality and Preference.
Portion
size revisited
In order to investigate, the team
designed two complementary experiments. The first involved 153 university
students in a laboratory setting. The scientists gave them large or small
portions of healthful apple chips or unhealthful potato chips.
As expected, the participants to
whom the team gave the larger portions of snacks — even the healthful versions
— ate significantly more than the group with the smaller portions.
The second phase took place at a
film festival. In total, the researchers gave 77 participants a small or a
large bag of baby carrots. They watched either a film about a restaurant, which
included many scenes involving food, or a romantic comedy with no particular
food references.
Again, those with the larger bag ate
more of the healthful snack. Interestingly, the effect was less pronounced in
the group that watched the film about the restaurant; this demonstrates the
significant impact that the environment can have on our eating behavior.
Prof.
Dubelaar thinks that this could provide an "opportunity for those seeking
to control intake to consider their environment when they're eating to help
reduce the effects of portion size."
Real-life
implications
Overall, the study's results give an
interesting insight into the convoluted world of food psychology. They might
also offer some new ways to improve our eating habits.
"The results of our current study tell us that this
portion size effect also holds true with healthy foods, which opens up the
potential for adjusting portion size when trying to encourage healthier eating
habits."
Prof.
Chris Dubelaar
He continues, "For example,
parents trying to get their children to eat more veggies could serve up larger
portions. This would also work for healthy snacks such as fruit or any food you
want someone to eat more of."
The authors suggest that beginning a
meal with a large portion of healthful food before a smaller plate of
unhealthful food might be a useful approach.
Because obesity is a growing concern
in the U.S. and elsewhere, understanding the nuances of our relationship with
food is more important than ever. Though this study used a relatively low
number of participants, it offers fresh insight and is likely to spur future
investigations in a similar vein.
There is a myriad of variables that
scientists could analyze in follow-up work. For instance, healthful and
unhealthful snacks often have very different flavor and texture profiles, so
understanding how each of these subtle differences impacts the portion size
effect will be interesting.
Until more studies are carried out,
the take-home message is: Don't worry how large the portion is, worry about
what you are apportioning.
No comments:
Post a Comment